On Thu 13 Jul 2000 at 12:22PM -0400, Laura Conrad wrote:
> T:C. intra-word melismas with underscore, except for dash on first one
> e6 d2 c2 A2 c3 d e4 A4 z2 A B c d e c f2 d e f d f2 e4 A4 A3 B
> w:O- cu- lus non vi - _ dit, nec _ _ _ _ _ _ au - _ _ _ _ ris au- di-
My objection to this is that "vi -" should mean the same as "vi-".
This is the way I would naturally read what you have written (rather than
assuming the "-" is a syllable on its own).
> T:E. Like C, but with the dash escaped
> e6 d2 c2 A2 c3 d e4 A4 z2 A B c d e c f2 d e f d f2 e4 A4 A3 B
> w:O- cu- lus non vi \- _ dit, nec _ _ _ _ _ _ au \- _ _ _ _ ris au- di-
This is how C should be written to indicate that the "-" really is a
word on its own.
James Allwright
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
