David Barnert says - > I continue to feel > that the K: field should describe the number of sharps or flats > without naming a tonic and/or a mode. Thanks David. I held back in the hope that someone else would say this. Selection of mode can be ambiguous or outside the experience of some people. When the tonic/mode system is the ONLY choice of K: command there are bound to be problems. Bryan To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Re: [abcusers] O'Neill's Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] O'Neill's Wendy Galovich
- Re: [abcusers] O'Neill's Guido Gonzato
