At 04:20 AM 10/9/2000 EDT, you wrote:
>David Barnert says -
>
>> I continue to feel
>> that the K: field should describe the number of sharps or flats
>> without naming a tonic and/or a mode.
>
>Thanks David. I held back in the hope that someone else would say this.
>Selection of mode can be ambiguous or outside the experience of some
people.
>When the tonic/mode system is the ONLY choice of K: command there are bound
>to be problems.
>
>Bryan
..And thank you Bryan, for indirectly acknowledging through your
wording here that there ARE legitimate reasons for *continuing* to sup-
port the tonic/mode system as a choice, apart from the need to have
other choices as well.
Wendy
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
