On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David Barnert says -
>
> > I continue to feel
> > that the K: field should describe the number of sharps or flats
> > without naming a tonic and/or a mode.
>
> Thanks David. I held back in the hope that someone else would say this.
> Selection of mode can be ambiguous or outside the experience of some people.
> When the tonic/mode system is the ONLY choice of K: command there are bound
> to be problems.
>
> Bryan
>
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
>http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
>
>
--
Dr. Guido Gonzato <ggonza at tin.it> - Linux System Administrator
My public PGP key is at http://ibogeo.df.unibo.it/guido/PGP.asc
"It is a good morning exercise for a research scientist to discard
a pet hypothesis every day before breakfast. It keeps him young."
-- Konrad Lorenz
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
