On Sun 08 Oct 2000 at 07:19AM -0400, Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> I have also proposed that there be an extension to the current syntax
> so that a ^, _, or = enclosed in parentheses would be printed that
> way. I don't remember anyone either disagreeing with this or rushing
> to implement it.
>
This suggestion would clash with '(' used for the start of a slur. You
might get away with it if the parser was clever enough to look for a
following accidental and an immediately following ')'.
James Allwright
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- [abcusers] accidentals in () Atte Andr� Jensen
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () John Henckel
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () Laura Conrad
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () James Allwright
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () John Henckel
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () James Allwright
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () Laura Conrad
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () John Henckel
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () jc
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () Steve Mansfield
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () John Atchley
- Re: [abcusers] accidentals in () John Henckel
