On Mon 13 Nov 2000 at 10:42AM +0000, Phil Taylor wrote:
>
> I think the answer to the first part is "sporadically". It is indeed
> a great lack of the current draft that the V: field is not discussed.
> The problem is that this is a very complicated extension, and nobody
> seems to want to sit down and write a draft proposal for it. There
> are already several mutually-incompatible variants about, which will
> have to be resolved.
>
When I first introduced the V: field into abc2midi, the syntax was very
simple:
V:<voice number>
Since then, people have added extra fields after the voice number, which
is where the complication arises. Could we all agree on this first
bit ? Simple parsers can then just ignore extra fields.
James Allwright
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
