Henning Kiel wrote
>So then why not use inline V: fields for this case?
>
>[V: 1] ab g2 | fe
>[V: 2] g2 bf | d2
>
No real reason except that it takes a couple of extra symbols, and
involves placing an inline field at the start of a line, which seems
a bit redundant.
>Looks neat and does not require music in a field (which is IMO *very*
>clumsy).
The trouble is that the music IS a field - for some reason Chris
didn't give it a field identifier separate from K:, and that in turn
has led to various problems with the order of fields which can precede
or follow K:, like P: and M:.
Phil Taylor
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
