On Mon, 27 May 2002 17:03:17 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil
Taylor) wrote:
>Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote:
>
>>Is the P: field voice dependent or not?
>
>All fields in the tune (except possibly those which come before the first
>V: field) are voice dependent. After the first V: there is nowhere to
>put a field which is not within a voice, so all fields apply only to the
>voice in which they are located.
I see T: and P: as 2 exceptions. abc2ps resets the voices on T: and P:,
so that the voice after these fields is the first one.
abcm2ps does the same for T:, but I changed the P: behaviour so you
may have one or many parts in a same music line. To keep compatibility,
the P: indication applies to the 1st voice only, so:
[V:1] ..
[V:2] ..
P:Diskan
[V:1] ..
[V:2] ..
is the same as:
[V:1] ..
[V:2] ..
V:1
[P:Diskan] ..
[V:2] ..
>>If the answer is not, why abc2abc extracts it only for the last voice?
[snip]
I think it is a general problem with multi-voices: as no standard is
defined, every developer tries to imagine what will be this one in
a next (?) future ;)
--
Ken ar c'henta� | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
| http://moinejf.free.fr/
P�p� Jef | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
