On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 11:31:59 +0200 (CEST), Manuel Reiter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
>> Putting an accent on the next character is not a good idea. The
>> PostScript manual says that the accents (range \220 - \237) exist for
>> historical reason, and they are not defined in the Latin-x encodings
>
>Hm, I didn't see that in the manual, could you tell me where to look? The
[snip]
PostScript Language Reference 3rd edition, Appendix E, page 783,
remark 2.
>Do you have any information on how far Unicode support is spread in the
>postscript world?
Not at all, but in a previous thread, I heard that the package 'a2ps'
could have some material.
--
Ken ar c'henta� | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
| http://moinejf.free.fr/
P�p� Jef | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
