Jean-Francois Moine writes:
| On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 20:19:47 +0200 (CEST), Manuel Reiter
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|       [snip]
| >I have noticed that both of you have dropped the original abc2ps's
| >transpose function. I guess there's a good reason for that, but I found it
| >quite convenient.
|       [snip]
|
| There was no transposition in abc2ps when abcm2ps started. Many people
| ask for this feature, but I don't think it is a job for a typesetting
| program. Generally, the tunes must be transposed only once and for all,
| and it exists a lot of programs (as abc2abc) and scripts (in perl) which
| already do the job.

Actually, what I found was that,  although  abc2ps  had  a  transpose
option, it didn't really work right for a lot of my music. So I wrote
several transpose scripts that I use instead.  And I didn't worry  if
other  changes  I  made  broke  abc2ps's transpose even more, since I
wasn't using it.  Doing it right inside a program like that is rather
difficult.   Every time you make a change to anything, you have to do
extensive tests to see if you've broken the transposer.  It's  a  lot
easier to do it with a separate program.

Part of the problem turns out to be the different  ways  that  people
want to transpose music. Something I often find useful is the ability
to take a musical fragment and transpose it. A transpose feature that
affects  whole tunes doesn't work for this.  A common example of this
is that I want a 2-part tune transposed up a 4th, but  then  the  2nd
part  is  too high.  So what I really want is the first part up a 4th
and the 2nd part down a 5th.  I've never seen a tune transposer  that
would do this.  By using a fragment transposer from within an editor,
it's easy.  But if you want to do it from abc2ps's command line,  you
end up with horrendous syntax for the command-line options.

One problem with a fragment transposer, though, is  that  it  usually
can't  see the key signature.  This causes some problems with getting
the accidentals right.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to