>>> Agreed. But the sign must be © or the word "copyright". The documents >>> say that (C) is not sufficient. >> >>According to the international copyright conventions, >>the word "copyright" followed by a name, followed by a >>year, is enough. The copyright sign "©" is not required >>and the ASCII variant "(C)" has no legal status at all. > > I understand that some countries only allow the © and the word is not > allowed. Which is why you so often see > > "Copyright © B Hill, 2003" or whatever. > > Remember there are no International Copyright Conventions. Some > countries don't have *any* copyright regulations. If © were to be mandatory to enable copyright at all, the convention would have to define the codingsystem also...
Arent To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
