In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:41:39AM +0100, Bernard Hill wrote: >> >> >> "Strange" key sigs such as the above (while clear in intent) are very >> non-standard. Are they really necessary? I've never played from one and >> would actually find it very difficult to play _b ^f > >See http://www.leeds.ac.uk/music/Info/RRTuneBk/gettune/00000c54.html >for an example of how they can be useful. Helpful for the typing, and >(IMO) more helpful in that they show the rules that apply, instead of >just confronting people with lots of accidental notes.
Ouch! The meaning may be clear, but much better with individual flats imo! I find it very hard to play correctly! (And why sharpen the fs in stave 5?) And from the abc source you have written K:A_b^f^c shouldn't that have a G# also since you've written K:A? Bernard Hill Braeburn Software Author of Music Publisher system Music Software written by musicians for musicians http://www.braeburn.co.uk Selkirk, Scotland To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
