On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:12:38PM +0000, John Chambers wrote: > Richard Robinson writes: > | > The only solution would be to write this: > | > K:Ephr^G > | > | Or K:E=f=c^G=d ? Longer, but maybe clearer. > > Actually, I do include accidentals with this scale at times. The main > reason is that with:
Oh, dear, confusing. I'm sorry, I meant on the opposite assumption, that that implied Emajor. > K:E=F^G > > This is *really* obvious that there's something "funny" going on. I > do like the look of this one. It's so blatantly non-classical. Cor. yes, it's definitely eye catching. > Anyway, the best way to approach this is probably to treat bo the > mode and any explicit accidentals as giving the key signature, so > major should not be assumed. You only assume major if there is no > key-signature information at all. This seems both expressive and comprehensible, and retains backwards compatability as well. -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
