> K:A_b^f^c
>
> shouldn't that have a G# also since you've written K:A?
and a lot of other stuff around the same subject.
Perhaps it's time to plug my idea of -
K:_b^f^c tonic=A mode=whatever
Completely unambiguous.
Talking of which, are there any plans for a procedure for amendments or extensions to the standard or do we just stick to the implement your favourite idea and argue about it afterwards system we have now?
Bryan Creer
- Re: [abcusers]ABC Standard 2.0 revision III Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers]ABC Standard 2.0 revision III John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers]ABC Standard 2.0 revision III Laura Conrad
- [abcusers] Re: ABC Standard 2.0 revision III DavBarnert
- Re: [abcusers]ABC Standard 2.0 revision III John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] Re: ABC Standard 2.0 revision III Bernard Hill
- [abcusers] Re: ABC Standard 2.0 revision III Bryancreer
