Bryan Creer writes: | | Perhaps it's time to plug my idea of - | | K:_b^f^c tonic=A mode=whatever | | Completely unambiguous.
Yeah, and I'd probably use that. Maybe I should just implement it. You could even include a rule saying that the mode is to be ignored if there is a key signature or you don't recognize it. That way, one could give the "correct" name for a scale that would be useful for lookups, without worrying about software understanding it. You just make sure you always give the key signature (possibly "none"). But we would have to continue to accept the older notation, and most people would continue to use it to save typing. | Talking of which, are there any plans for a procedure for amendments or | extensions to the standard or do we just stick to the implement your favourite idea | and argue about it afterwards system we have now? What a concept! This is a gang of musicians, you know. What are the chances of us ever agreeing to any such thing? Next you'll be telling us that Britney Spears is a musician ... To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
