Irwin Oppenheim wrote -
>Bryans alternative proposal didn't seem unreasonable,
>if he can clearly indicate how pseudo comments should
>be parsed.
I didn't get that till after my last posting. Have I answered the question? If not, I'm not sure that I see the problem.
Bryan Creer
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Wil Macaulay
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes I. Oppenheim
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Jack Campin
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Wil Macaulay
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Phil Taylor
- [abcusers] Re: backslashes Bryancreer
- Re: [abcusers] Re: backslashes Wil Macaulay
- [abcusers] Re: backslashes Bryancreer
- [abcusers] Re: backslashes Bryancreer
- Bryancreer
