The way I planned to handle pseudocomments was to look for
particular strings like %%MIDI and ignore anything else that
starts with % - so I wouldn't even know it was a pseudocomment
unless it was a specific thing I parse.
Again, that's why you'd use pseudocomments, so that it transparently
extends the language.
wil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Chambers wrote -
>Actually, that would be equivalent to
>
>%%MIDI no%%ba%%rlines
My idea was that, having read "%%MIDI no\", applications that handled pseudocomments would know to ignore leading "%%" until they got to a line that didn't end "\".
Bryan Creer
