> Is there a reason to label this as being SAML specific rather than just > letting it be XML values and letting the construct type identify the type of > values?
Because it would be expensive to have to go parsing things just to find the one you knew how to handle. Same reason most XML vocabularies have their own MIME types. -- Scott _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
