> What I suggested was that the overall attribute be allowed to carry > arbitrary XML rather than be restricted to SAML. It would still have the CT > field which could be used to identify more specifically what the XML content > was.
Doesn't that just create a second registry to maintain? You could stick URIs into the CT field to avoid that, I suppose, but I think it just moves the document into the position of managing a framework for all uses of XML in RADIUS attributes, which is probably out of scope. -- Scott _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
