[Jim, your mail server is rejecting all my messages, so note that I've chosen to not send some private comments I would have otherwise sent you.]
>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott E <[email protected]> writes: >> Is there a reason to label this as being SAML specific rather >> than just letting it be XML values and letting the construct type >> identify the type of values? Cantor,> Because it would be expensive to have to go parsing things Cantor,> just to find the one you knew how to handle. Same reason Cantor,> most XML vocabularies have their own MIME types. Also, we're going to need to attach processing semantics here, like the discussion of technical trust we've been having. Those semantics are very much SAML specific. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
