On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Mike Nordell wrote:

> The Q&D fix I now applied is to let the UT_Vector yet again zero out its
> entries. This will slow it down somewhat again (though I'm not sure it will
> be even noticable). The long-term solution would be to use a real sparse
> array or something resembling std::map.
> 

Did you just add the memset() when we re-allocate the array?
I put the code in but had it commented out since I figured
it would expose some potential problems.

Thomas


Reply via email to