Thomas Fletcher wrote:
> > The Q&D fix I now applied is to let the UT_Vector yet again zero out its
> > entries.
[...]
> Did you just add the memset() when we re-allocate the array?

Sort of, I also fixed the start and size parameters to the memset call.

> I put the code in but had it commented out since I figured
> it would expose some potential problems.

Was SEGV a problem? ;-> If so, I think (*hope*) I took care of it.

/Mike - please don't cc


Reply via email to