Paul Rohr wrote: > > Sounds like somebody needs the same bit of code that all web browsers have. > You need to discriminate between two disjoint sets of color specifications: > > - six characters that look like hex > - a discrete match in some lookup table Ehm, stupid question maybe, but why is the current way of specifying colors (through hex RGB) not good enough in all cases? Why would you ever want `blue' in the fileformat, instead of `00ff00'? I just don't see any advantage in this. I mean, the whole file format is low-level nitty-gritty stuff, so why add abstraction only for color? Just wondering, Frodo -- Frodo Looijaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP key and more: http://huizen.dds.nl/~frodol Defenestration n. (formal or joc.): The act of removing Windows from your computer in disgust, usually followed by the installation of Linux or some other Unix-like operating system.
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Randy Kramer
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Paul Rohr
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Randy Kramer
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Sam TH
- Re: Questions about our XML gramma... Randy Kramer
- semantics for line-height property Paul Rohr
- semantics and syntax for sub/sup variants Paul Rohr
- syntax for the color property Paul Rohr
- Re: syntax for the color property Frodo Looijaard
- Re: syntax for the color property rms
- Re: syntax for the color property Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color prope... John L. Clark
- Re: syntax for the color prope... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color prope... Frodo Looijaard
- Re: syntax for the color prope... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Martin Sevior
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color property (take 2) Paul Rohr
- Re: syntax for the color property (take 2) Leonard Rosenthol
