On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:08:27PM +0100, Frodo Looijaard wrote: > Paul Rohr wrote: > > You need to discriminate between two disjoint sets of color specifications: > > - six characters that look like hex > > - a discrete match in some lookup table > Ehm, stupid question maybe, but why is the current way of specifying > colors (through hex RGB) not good enough in all cases? Why would you > ever want `blue' in the fileformat, instead of `00ff00'? I just don't > see any advantage in this. I mean, the whole file format is low-level > nitty-gritty stuff, so why add abstraction only for color? Simple: what's the advantage of XML if it's not human readable? but I agree abiword's xml format may become too complex for human edition, though, thus validating the stupid question. I also tend to think that it's more efficient to save it as RGB color codes, that to add extra parsing to the color property. hugs, rms
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Paul Rohr
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Randy Kramer
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Sam TH
- Re: Questions about our XML gramma... Randy Kramer
- semantics for line-height property Paul Rohr
- semantics and syntax for sub/sup variants Paul Rohr
- syntax for the color property Paul Rohr
- Re: syntax for the color property Frodo Looijaard
- Re: syntax for the color property rms
- Re: syntax for the color property Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color prope... John L. Clark
- Re: syntax for the color prope... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color prope... Frodo Looijaard
- Re: syntax for the color prope... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Martin Sevior
- Re: Questions about our XML grammar Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color property (take 2) Paul Rohr
- Re: syntax for the color property (take 2) Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: syntax for the color property (take 2) Frodo Looijaard
