RE: version 1.0

[Paul Rohr]

At 03:11 PM 2/6/01 +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
>> > Oh no. Please do not consider opening 1.1 until 1.0 has shipped and
>> > have had a few weeks out there - we're bound to get bug reports from
>> > new users after 1.0 goes public. And we want full deveoper attention
>> > on 1.0.x before even considering 1.1
>> >
>> > IMO, of course.
>
>+1
>
>P.S.: If we follow the Apache style, we need at least 3 +1 to accept
>something.

+1 

third post!  third post!  :-)

Paul,
who still doesn't have a Slashdot account