Re: integrating bidi (was Re: version 1.0)

[Mike Nordell]

Jesper Skov wrote:
> Sam> It looks the the current signature is:
>
> Sam>  virtual void findPointCoords(UT_uint32 iOffset, UT_sint32& x,
> Sam> UT_sint32& y, UT_sint32& height);
>
> Sam> What do you want to change it to?  This is a change that
> Sam> shouldn't be too hard.
>
> It needs two sets of x/y/height return values as the point may take up
> two positions.

Would it ever make sense to also return the width? In that case it could
possibly be more efficient to return two rects instead.

/Mike - please only reply to the list