Re: integrating bidi (was Re: version 1.0)

[Sam TH]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 08:56:11PM -0000, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> The one thing that would make this number immediately smaller 
> would be if we could agree to change the signature of the 
> findPointCoords functions to that required by bidi; this is 
> responsible for the worst and most confusing #ifdef's.

It looks the the current signature is:

 virtual void findPointCoords(UT_uint32 iOffset, UT_sint32& x, 
        UT_sint32& y, UT_sint32& height);

What do you want to change it to?  This is a change that shouldn't be
too hard.

On second thought, why can't this just be overloaded?  

> PS I will make a fresh bidi patch over the weekend.

Sounds good.
           
        sam th               
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
        GnuPG Key:  
        http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key

PGP signature