On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Sam TH wrote: > > what do you think about the CVS branch idea I suggested? That would > allow you and Joaquin to use Glade, and would prevent Aaron from > collapsing from hysteria. (no offense, aaron). > > If you want to discuss this more deeply, lots of people are currently > wasting time on IRC. > Sorry no time for IRC today. I'm ambivalent about the CVS branch thing. I would like to leave libglade in place until after we have the Lists dialog. It will be much easier that way. Aaron has contaminated his diskspace with about 10 megabytes of well functioning libraries already :-) Cheers Martin
- Re: commit -- libglade support Paul Rohr
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- apache-style vetoes Paul Rohr
- Re: apache-style vetoes Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Aaron Lehmann
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Sam TH
- RE: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- RE: commit -- libglade supp... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Martin Sevior
