On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:07:13PM +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
Since everyone seems to want to be reasonable about this, how's this
sound for an idea:
1. We revert the glade changes on the main tree.
2. We create a cvs branch (called glade-list).
3. Joaquin commits his changes on the branch.
4. Our illustirious list hackers work on the branch until they get a
working dialog.
5. The changes (minus the glade stuff) is merged back to the main
tree.
This allows for (1) Easy work on the dialog and (2) no interference
with anything else.
Any objections?
sam th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key
Motto: CVS solves all your problems.
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade supp... Martin Sevior
- RE: commit -- libglade supp... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade support Aaron Lehmann
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade supp... Thomas Fletcher
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Sprague, ITSN
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
PGP signature