Aaron wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:12:23PM +1100, Martin Sevior wrote: > > If Joaquin is happy with this I'll go along. However I don't > think we need > > such a branch because all the Unix developers (now including Aaron) have > > glade installed. > > Bullshit. I have refused to install gnome and therefore been unable to > compile abi. your fault. Take libglade without gnome support. > Breaking the tree is a crime. mon cul (sorry, but I don't know the translation of that). Your tree copy is broken because apt-get is not giving you a non gnome version of libglade. Anyway, as I said before, the libglade code will be moved to a branch. Cheers, -- Joaquin Cuenca Abela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: commit -- libglade support Sam TH
- Re: commit -- libglade support Martin Sevior
- Re: commit -- libglade support Aaron Lehmann
- RE: commit -- libglade support Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- RE: commit -- libglade supp... Thomas Fletcher
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- Re: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
- RE: commit -- libglade support Sprague, ITSN
- RE: commit -- libglade support Dom Lachowicz
