On 04/18/01 Thomas Fletcher wrote: > Again the other thing to consider, as someone (dom I think) > mentioned is that perhaps going the ImageMagic route with a > common API that then uses these same libs would be more worthwhile > (and also reduce our internal code bloat). On unix at least, it would be far better to use gdk-pixbuf: 1) it's a lot smaller 2) it's faster 3) it loads the image libs at runtime only when needed 4) it will come anyway for free with Gtk 2.0 lupus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better
- Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Paul Rohr
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Thomas Fletcher
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Paolo Molaro
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMag... Thomas Fletcher
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. Imag... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMag... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Patrick Lam
- Re: Linking against libjpeg ? Sam TH
- what do we want into 1.0? (... Joaquin Cuenca Abela
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Linking against libjpeg... rms
