On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:07:25PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 02:45:11PM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2001, ha shao wrote: > > Also everywhere, CJK hackers told us that not all iconv > > implementations know "CP950" and "CP936" under these names - if it's true for > > iconv AW is linked with, fallback charset names "BIG5" and "GB2312" should be > > used. > > Since the CP950, CP936 are already used for \fcharset before and > have Chinese shown properly, I assumed the fallback is already > called somewhere in RTF importer. If not, it is safer to add it. > Maybe the problem is deal with around line 499 in xap_EncodingManager.cpp where have a mapping b/w codepage to charset for Chinese encodings. -- Best regard hashao
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Andrew Dunbar
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try ha shao
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Andrew Dunbar
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Vlad Harchev
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Vlad Harchev
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try ha shao
- iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 11... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix fo... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix fo... Vlad Harchev
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fi... Vlad Harchev
