On Wed, 23 May 2001, ha shao wrote: Hi, The patch looks fine to me. > > Patch Attached.... > > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:28:12PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We probably need somewhere a table that takes an array of > > fallback encoding names. Most of the entries probably only > > need one fallback name but the Japanese Shift JIS ones > > might need more. Look in the encodings.def file in the > > libiconv source... > > > > Does this patch meet the requirement? > -- > Best regard > hashao > Best regards, -Vlad
- iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164... Vlad Harchev
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug ... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug ... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug ... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug ... ha shao
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug ... Andrew Dunbar
- Re: iconv vs. libiconv, was Re: Patch: Fix for Bug ... ha shao
- Vlad Harchev
