> I agree that having 32 UT_UCSChar would vaste lot of memory, and > I would like to see a case made first why we need to support 32-bit > Unicode.
I wonder if it's worth making this a compile-time option?
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again.
That's how we know we're alive: we're wrong.
--- Philip Roth
