On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 10:02:40AM -0000, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > I agree that having 32 UT_UCSChar would vaste lot of memory, and > I would like to see a case made first why we need to support 32-bit > Unicode.
One more note: If memory space is an issue, consider using UTF-16 with surrogate pairs. See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/utf_bom.html for more information. I heard from my colleague that OpenOffice.org uses UTF-16 internally. (BTW, glibc uses UCS4 internally AFAIK.) Cheers, Anthony -- Anthony Fok Tung-Ling ThizLinux Laboratory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.thizlinux.com/ Debian Chinese Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org/intl/zh/ Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp! http://www.olvc.ab.ca/
