Op ma 29-07-2002, om 17:07 schreef Joaquin Cuenca Abela: > > --- "j.m.maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > AFAICT, this is just a hack and doesn't fixes the > > real problem I > > addressed is my mail from a few minutes ago. > > btw, IMO your problem is a completely orthogonal one > to the transparent stuff. True, I see that now
> Just to put some background on this problem (to > everybody that has not followed all that closely > enough), when a run has a "transparent" (or white) > background, (But now you are getting to my problem again....) No, a run isn't supposed to have a background or transparent color, it's container may have on, but a Run not > and somebody asks the run to clear itself, > the run asks the page what is its background, The clear call should be forwarded to it's parent container. The run should not be allowed to do this and then > we do a lookup which ends showing in the performance > stats (basically because we ask each run to clear > itself a *lot* of times). > This will indeed help a for now. Although this should be rewritten sometimes Marc
