--- "j.m.maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> AFAICT, this is just a hack and doesn't fixes the
> real problem I
> addressed is my mail from a few minutes ago.

btw, IMO your problem is a completely orthogonal one
to the transparent stuff.

Just to put some background on this problem (to
everybody that has not followed all that closely
enough), when a run has a "transparent" (or white)
background, and somebody asks the run to clear itself,
the run asks the page what is its background, and then
we do a lookup which ends showing in the performance
stats (basically because we ask each run to clear
itself a *lot* of times).

As you may guess, a little cache here helps a lot.

Cheers,


=====
Joaquin Cuenca Abela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

Reply via email to