IMO, a better idea than a GUI port would be a CUI port ala Wordperfect 5.1 for DOS. This would not be a port so much as a re-write, but it would certainly have much less overhead.
Tim Not volunteering ;-) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Nehren Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:19 PM To: Hubert Figuiere Cc: ArcadePreserv Center; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Free]DOS port? > You could run it under Linux or BSD :-) Even Win95 runs on a 486. True, even Win95 runs on a 486. But X Window + GNOME? That's pushing it. It's even moderately time-consuming on my p150. Maybe if you souped up its RAM and swap space, but otherwise, you'd have to have infinite patience to run anything in X under a 486. -Chris ----------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body. ----------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
