On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > Provision of a figure role in Acc APIs is not duplicating anything in HTML. > It is about providing a cross technology identification of a [feature] that > does not currently have a specific definition.
Why is the current implementation not sufficient? > Currently <figure> is defined (and implemented as such) as a group role > in Acc APis with an accessible name derived from a child <figcaption> if > there is one. It seems that if you have an equivalent situation in SVG where for some reason you cannot use <figure>, you could always use this, no? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
