Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily "mathrubhumi" that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission
On 1/11/13, Prashanth <[email protected]> wrote: > I too surprised by the news. > The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue > certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum > eligibility are cleared lectureship. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SC Vashishth" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM > Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net > > >>I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of >> candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get >> that >> relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit >> by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the >> process >> untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. >> >> By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites >> situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the >> Kerala >> HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for >> clarifications. >> We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning >> thereby that the order has achieved finality. >> >> Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order >> from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a >> very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. >> Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening >> in >> the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ >> answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies >> affecting the persons with disabilities in general. >> regards >> >> >> >> On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by >>> training myself. >>> Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the >>> cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in >>> favor of candidates. >>> So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the >>> similar >>> ruling for all candidates? >>> Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates >>> automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. >>> Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it >>> is >>> a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when >>> >>> a >>> provision is affecting many persons. >>> PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of Prashanth >>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM >>> To: AccessIndia >>> Cc: World Opinion Google's group: >>> Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants >>> Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: >>> >>> Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST >>> >>> NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire >>> from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear >>> >>> on >>> the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility >>> Test >>> (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun >>> Chaudhari >>> granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to >>> decide >>> its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, >>> if >>> UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC >>> officials to be present at the next hearing. >>> >>> The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by >>> Gokulpeth >>> resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing >>> minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The >>> test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects >>> for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). >>> >>> Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti >>> Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in >>> the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to >>> score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the >>> criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was >>> never communicated till the declaration of the result. >>> >>> When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared >>> failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC >>> had >>> fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have >>> scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them >>> individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should >>> >>> be >>> declared successful. >>> >>> She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of >>> June >>> 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general >>> category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. >>> >>> The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of >>> candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not >>> responded >>> properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, >>> the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC >>> notification, >>> as the number of candidates were much more. >>> >>> >>> >>> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers >>> >>> >>> With thanks and regards >>> >>> >>> >>> (Rajesh Asudani) >>> Assistant General Manager >>> Reserve Bank of India >>> Nagpur >>> Cell: 9420397185 >>> o: +91 712 2806846 >>> R: 2591349 >>> >>> (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want to want >>> them.) >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes >>> calls >>> asking for personal information like your bank account details, >>> passwords, >>> etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in >>> any >>> manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. >>> >>> Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential >>> and >>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are >>> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, >>> use, >>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained >>> in >>> this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If >>> you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail >>> >>> or >>> telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any >>> attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments >>> for >>> the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability >>> for >>> any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. >>> >>> -- >> Warm regards, >> >> Subhash Chandra Vashishth >> Advocate- Delhi High Court >> Mobile: +91 (11) 9811125521 >> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Consider >> environment! >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > -- Prasanth. > True friendship consists not innmultitude of friends, but in their worth> and > value> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
