vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213
On 1/12/13, Shona Man <[email protected]> wrote: > good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed > by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers > individually must be awarded the benifit. > > On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily >> "mathrubhumi" that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of >> Kerala HC against that dicission >> >> On 1/11/13, Prashanth <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I too surprised by the news. >>> The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] >>> issue >>> certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having >>> minimum >>> eligibility are cleared lectureship. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "SC Vashishth" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net >>> >>> >>>>I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of >>>> candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get >>>> that >>>> relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the >>>> benefit >>>> by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the >>>> process >>>> untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. >>>> >>>> By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites >>>> situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the >>>> Kerala >>>> HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for >>>> clarifications. >>>> We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning >>>> thereby that the order has achieved finality. >>>> >>>> Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order >>>> from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a >>>> very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. >>>> Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development >>>> happening >>>> in >>>> the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ >>>> answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies >>>> affecting the persons with disabilities in general. >>>> regards >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer >>>>> by >>>>> training myself. >>>>> Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the >>>>> cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling >>>>> in >>>>> favor of candidates. >>>>> So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the >>>>> similar >>>>> ruling for all candidates? >>>>> Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all >>>>> candidates >>>>> automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. >>>>> Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it >>>>> is >>>>> a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, >>>>> when >>>>> >>>>> a >>>>> provision is affecting many persons. >>>>> PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> On Behalf Of Prashanth >>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM >>>>> To: AccessIndia >>>>> Cc: World Opinion Google's group: >>>>> Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants >>>>> Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: >>>>> >>>>> Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST >>>>> >>>>> NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under >>>>> fire >>>>> from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come >>>>> clear >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>> the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility >>>>> Test >>>>> (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun >>>>> Chaudhari >>>>> granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to >>>>> decide >>>>> its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with >>>>> orders, >>>>> if >>>>> UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC >>>>> officials to be present at the next hearing. >>>>> >>>>> The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by >>>>> Gokulpeth >>>>> resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification >>>>> imposing >>>>> minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. >>>>> The >>>>> test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various >>>>> subjects >>>>> for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). >>>>> >>>>> Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti >>>>> Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% >>>>> in >>>>> the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to >>>>> score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be >>>>> the >>>>> criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was >>>>> never communicated till the declaration of the result. >>>>> >>>>> When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared >>>>> failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC >>>>> had >>>>> fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to >>>>> have >>>>> scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them >>>>> individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she >>>>> should >>>>> >>>>> be >>>>> declared successful. >>>>> >>>>> She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of >>>>> June >>>>> 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general >>>>> category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. >>>>> >>>>> The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of >>>>> candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not >>>>> responded >>>>> properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In >>>>> Kerala, >>>>> the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC >>>>> notification, >>>>> as the number of candidates were much more. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> With thanks and regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (Rajesh Asudani) >>>>> Assistant General Manager >>>>> Reserve Bank of India >>>>> Nagpur >>>>> Cell: 9420397185 >>>>> o: +91 712 2806846 >>>>> R: 2591349 >>>>> >>>>> (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want to want >>>>> them.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes >>>>> calls >>>>> asking for personal information like your bank account details, >>>>> passwords, >>>>> etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond >>>>> in >>>>> any >>>>> manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. >>>>> >>>>> Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential >>>>> and >>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >>>>> are >>>>> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, >>>>> use, >>>>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained >>>>> in >>>>> this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. >>>>> If >>>>> you have received this email by error, please notify us by return >>>>> e-mail >>>>> >>>>> or >>>>> telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any >>>>> attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments >>>>> for >>>>> the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no >>>>> liability >>>>> for >>>>> any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Warm regards, >>>> >>>> Subhash Chandra Vashishth >>>> Advocate- Delhi High Court >>>> Mobile: +91 (11) 9811125521 >>>> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Consider >>>> environment! >>>> >>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>>> of >>>> >>>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>> >>>> >>>> Search for old postings at: >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>>> [email protected] >>>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>>> >>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>>> please visit the list home page at >>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>> of >>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> [email protected] >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please >>> visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Prasanth. >>> True friendship consists not innmultitude of friends, but in their >>> worth> >>> and value> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >> of >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> > > > -- > LL.M candidate > at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
