good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed
by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers
individually must be awarded the benifit.

On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily
> "mathrubhumi" that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of
> Kerala HC against that dicission
>
> On 1/11/13, Prashanth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I too surprised by the news.
>> The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012]
>> issue
>> certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having
>> minimum
>> eligibility are cleared lectureship.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "SC Vashishth" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net
>>
>>
>>>I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of
>>> candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get
>>> that
>>> relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the
>>> benefit
>>> by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the
>>> process
>>> untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs.
>>>
>>> By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites
>>> situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the
>>> Kerala
>>> HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for
>>> clarifications.
>>> We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning
>>> thereby that the order has achieved finality.
>>>
>>> Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order
>>> from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a
>>> very important purpose of keeping all of us informed.
>>> Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening
>>> in
>>> the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ
>>> answering  substantial  questions of law, interpretation or policies
>>> affecting the persons with disabilities in general.
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by
>>>> training myself.
>>>> Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the
>>>> cumulative criteria  afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in
>>>> favor of candidates.
>>>> So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the
>>>> similar
>>>> ruling for all candidates?
>>>> Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates
>>>> automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so.
>>>> Agreed that  Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it
>>>> is
>>>> a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately,
>>>> when
>>>>
>>>> a
>>>> provision is affecting many persons.
>>>> PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> On Behalf Of Prashanth
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM
>>>> To: AccessIndia
>>>> Cc: World Opinion Google's group:
>>>> Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants
>>>> Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria:
>>>>
>>>> Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST
>>>>
>>>> NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under
>>>> fire
>>>> from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come
>>>> clear
>>>>
>>>> on
>>>> the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility
>>>> Test
>>>> (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun
>>>> Chaudhari
>>>> granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to
>>>> decide
>>>> its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders,
>>>> if
>>>> UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC
>>>> officials to be present at the next hearing.
>>>>
>>>> The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by
>>>> Gokulpeth
>>>> resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification
>>>> imposing
>>>> minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The
>>>> test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various
>>>> subjects
>>>> for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF).
>>>>
>>>> Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti
>>>> Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50%
>>>> in
>>>> the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to
>>>> score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be
>>>> the
>>>> criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was
>>>> never communicated till the declaration of the result.
>>>>
>>>> When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared
>>>> failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC
>>>> had
>>>> fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have
>>>> scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them
>>>> individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she
>>>> should
>>>>
>>>> be
>>>> declared successful.
>>>>
>>>> She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of
>>>> June
>>>> 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general
>>>> category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law.
>>>>
>>>> The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of
>>>> candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not
>>>> responded
>>>> properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In
>>>> Kerala,
>>>> the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC
>>>> notification,
>>>> as the number of candidates were much more.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With thanks and regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 (Rajesh Asudani)
>>>> Assistant General Manager
>>>> Reserve Bank of India
>>>> Nagpur
>>>> Cell: 9420397185
>>>> o: +91 712 2806846
>>>> R: 2591349
>>>>
>>>> (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want to want
>>>> them.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes
>>>> calls
>>>> asking for personal information like your bank account details,
>>>> passwords,
>>>> etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in
>>>> any
>>>> manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look.
>>>>
>>>> Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
>>>> and
>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>>>> are
>>>> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,
>>>> use,
>>>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained
>>>> in
>>>> this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited.
>>>> If
>>>> you have received this email by error, please notify us by return
>>>> e-mail
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>> telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any
>>>> attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments
>>>> for
>>>> the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability
>>>> for
>>>> any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Warm regards,
>>>
>>> Subhash Chandra Vashishth
>>> Advocate- Delhi High Court
>>> Mobile: +91 (11) 9811125521
>>> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Consider
>>> environment!
>>>
>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility
>>> of
>>>
>>> mobile phones / Tabs on:
>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Search for old postings at:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send a message to
>>> [email protected]
>>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>>
>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>>> please visit the list home page at
>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility
>> of
>> mobile phones / Tabs on:
>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> Search for old postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a message to
>> [email protected]
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please
>> visit the list home page at
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Prasanth.
>> True friendship consists not innmultitude of friends, but in their worth>
>> and value>
>
>
> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
> mobile phones / Tabs on:
> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to
> [email protected]
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
> visit the list home page at
> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>


-- 
LL.M candidate
 at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi


Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to