After reading Jim's statement, my position is a bit different.
Multicast security is severely needed.
Not making it a WG document augments the risk that the subject is frozen
and no progress is made.
To guarantee progress, adoption seems to me the right way forward.
Peter
Jim Schaad schreef op 2017-03-07 02:55:
After thinking about this for a long time, I will reluctantly state a
position.
I do not believe that the WG should adopt this document at least until
such a time as a version has been released which does a substantially
better job of restricting the scope of the problem to be solved. If
the WG then decides to relax that scope so be it.
Jim
FROM: Ace [mailto:[email protected]] ON BEHALF OF Kepeng Li
SENT: Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:48 AM
TO: [email protected]
CC: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>; Hannes
Tschofenig <[email protected]>
SUBJECT: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-somaraju-ace-multicast-02
Hello all,
This note begins a Call For Adoption for
draft-somaraju-ace-multicast-02 [1] to be adopted as an ACE working
group item, and added in the charter. The call ends on Mar 7, 2017.
Keep in mind that adoption of a document does not mean the document
as-is is ready for publication. It is merely acceptance of the
document as a starting point for what will be the final product of the
ACE working group. The working group is free to make changes to the
document according to the normal consensus process.
Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition,
preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item.
Thanks,
Kind Regards
Kepeng (ACE co-chair)
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-somaraju-ace-multicast/
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
