It might just take one more update for me to feel happy with this. However, an update of the document has not yet been forth coming since I asked for a couple of different types of things for the security solutions and so forth. I would hope that the authors are not waiting for the outcome of this adoption call as a gating factor to produce such an update.
jim > -----Original Message----- > From: peter van der Stok [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 12:33 AM > To: Jim Schaad <[email protected]> > Cc: 'Kepeng Li' <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-somaraju-ace-multicast-02 > > After reading Jim's statement, my position is a bit different. > Multicast security is severely needed. > Not making it a WG document augments the risk that the subject is frozen > and no progress is made. > To guarantee progress, adoption seems to me the right way forward. > > Peter > > Jim Schaad schreef op 2017-03-07 02:55: > > After thinking about this for a long time, I will reluctantly state a > > position. > > > > I do not believe that the WG should adopt this document at least until > > such a time as a version has been released which does a substantially > > better job of restricting the scope of the problem to be solved. If > > the WG then decides to relax that scope so be it. > > > > Jim > > > > FROM: Ace [mailto:[email protected]] ON BEHALF OF Kepeng Li > > SENT: Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:48 AM > > TO: [email protected] > > CC: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>; Hannes > > Tschofenig <[email protected]> > > SUBJECT: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-somaraju-ace-multicast-02 > > > > Hello all, > > > > This note begins a Call For Adoption for > > draft-somaraju-ace-multicast-02 [1] to be adopted as an ACE working > > group item, and added in the charter. The call ends on Mar 7, 2017. > > > > Keep in mind that adoption of a document does not mean the document > > as-is is ready for publication. It is merely acceptance of the > > document as a starting point for what will be the final product of the > > ACE working group. The working group is free to make changes to the > > document according to the normal consensus process. > > > > Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition, > > preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Kepeng (ACE co-chair) > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-somaraju-ace-multicast/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Ace mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
