On 7 Mar 2017, at 02:55, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > > After thinking about this for a long time, I will reluctantly state a > position. > > I do not believe that the WG should adopt this document at least until such a > time as a version has been released which does a substantially better job of > restricting the scope of the problem to be solved. If the WG then decides to > relax that scope so be it.
I believe this editorial issue is exactly the kind of thing the WG process is very good in fixing. So I support adoption at this time; this is not a WGLC. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
