On 2017-09-28 19:21, Michael StJohns wrote:
On 9/27/2017 1:29 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
Goran has a good point here.
Actually - I don't think he does. If there is a sufficiently
interested group of people that want to talk certificate enrollment and
there is a chair available and willing then do an interim on that. If
there is a group of sufficiently interested group of people that want to
talk about the roadmap then do an interim on that. If ACE doesn't want
to have such an interim then perhaps it still gets done as a virtual
BOF. But this has as much legitimacy as any of the other ACE work items.
Virtual interims have another more common name - teleconferences.
They're cheap to hold.
Don't hold the certificate stuff hostage to the roadmap stuff and don't
confuse a F2F interim with a virtual interim with respect to providing a
false either or choice.
The IETF is bottom up - we work on what the members are interested in
working on. It's not a great idea holding one idea hostage as a means
of trying to get work done on something else.
Later, Mike
Mike, I don't believe that discussing new ideas and making progress on
chartered items is mutually exclusive, but we should still try to
separate them, in order to avoid going getting side-tracked.
There are some chartered milestones that have been unduly delayed, so
I'm really in favor of giving them some precedence, in case resources
(such as meeting time) are limited.
/Ludwig
--
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
Security Lab, RISE SICS
Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
