On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:04:45AM +0100, Ludwig Seitz wrote:
> On 2018-02-08 21:08, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > Right, this seems to be the key point. If there's not any running
> > code and not going to be any, it's pretty likely that the spec (for
> > this portion) will not actually be usable.
> Note that there is running code for client token, if you look here:
Thanks for the link; I was unaware.
> Also note that I'm not saying we shouldn't move this to a separate
> draft, but let's keep our facts straight. I'm really curious to see
> Hannes' paper once he can release it.
Ace mailing list