Hello Zaheduzzaman, Thank you for your review. The issues you found are now fixed in version -14.
Note that there seems to be an problem with xml2rfc, since the outdated reference to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33 should have been taken care of by the tooling. I have notified the maintainer of xml2rfc and fixed the draft manually. /Ludwig > -----Original Message----- > From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: den 24 mars 2021 10:31 > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-ace-oauth-par...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace- > oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT) > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Section 1: > Nit : s/Respresentation/Representation > > * Section 3.1: > I have similar observation as Martin Duke, and the resolution suggested by > author looks fine with me as long as the cases are distinguishable. > > * Section 12: > Refers to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33, -38 version is available now. > > _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
