Thanks for the update. My comments are addressed now.
Found a nit : It is RECOMMENDED that an AS reject a request
containing a symmetric key value in the 'req_cnf' field
(kty=Symmetric), since the AS is expected to be able to generate
better symmetric keys than a constrained client. client (Note: this does
not apply to key identifiers referencing a symmetric key).
s/reject/rejects
BR
Zahed
On 2021-03-26, 08:17, "iesg on behalf of Seitz Ludwig" <[email protected]
on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
Hello Zaheduzzaman,
Thank you for your review. The issues you found are now fixed in version
-14.
Note that there seems to be an problem with xml2rfc, since the outdated
reference to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33 should have been taken care of by
the tooling.
I have notified the maintainer of xml2rfc and fixed the draft manually.
/Ludwig
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> Sent: den 24 mars 2021 10:31
> To: The IESG <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-
> oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
>
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory
> paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * Section 1:
> Nit : s/Respresentation/Representation
>
> * Section 3.1:
> I have similar observation as Martin Duke, and the resolution suggested
by
> author looks fine with me as long as the cases are distinguishable.
>
> * Section 12:
> Refers to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33, -38 version is available now.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
