Sure. Thanks. BR Zahed
On 2021-03-26, 15:08, "Seitz Ludwig" <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Zahed, If it's ok with you I'll fix that in conjunction with the IETF-editor review (they will probably find a few more like this). /Ludwig > -----Original Message----- > From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[email protected]> > Sent: den 26 mars 2021 15:04 > To: Seitz Ludwig <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf- > ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT) > > Thanks for the update. My comments are addressed now. > > Found a nit : It is RECOMMENDED that an AS reject a request > containing a symmetric key value in the 'req_cnf' field > (kty=Symmetric), since the AS is expected to be able to generate > better symmetric keys than a constrained client. client (Note: this does > not apply to key identifiers referencing a symmetric key). > > s/reject/rejects > > BR > Zahed > > > On 2021-03-26, 08:17, "iesg on behalf of Seitz Ludwig" <iesg- > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Zaheduzzaman, > > Thank you for your review. The issues you found are now fixed in version - > 14. > > Note that there seems to be an problem with xml2rfc, since the outdated > reference to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33 should have been taken care of > by the tooling. > I have notified the maintainer of xml2rfc and fixed the draft manually. > > /Ludwig > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[email protected]> > > Sent: den 24 mars 2021 10:31 > > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf- > ace- > > oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT) > > > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email > > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory > > paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > * Section 1: > > Nit : s/Respresentation/Representation > > > > * Section 3.1: > > I have similar observation as Martin Duke, and the resolution suggested > by > > author looks fine with me as long as the cases are distinguishable. > > > > * Section 12: > > Refers to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33, -38 version is available now. > > > > > _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
